How To Spot Fake Louis Vuitton Bumbag

Buying a fake Louis Vuitton Bumbag is one of the worst nightmares of a fashionista. The market is flooded with different fake bags; some can be spotted immediately, but others are harder to spot.

In this article, we described eight methods of spotting the difference between a fake and a real Louis Vuitton Bumbag.

Want to learn more about authentication of Louis Vuitton items? Check them out on: Louis Vuitton Neverfull MM, LV Pochette, LV Palm Springs Mini.

• The General Look  
• The Top Side
• The Font
• The Handle Attachments
• The Hardware
• The Puller
• The Tag
• The Label

The General Look Method

The bag's standout feature is its size, offering supreme comfort for wear and ample space for essentials. Replica manufacturers missed the mark on replicating this aspect, producing a piece significantly larger than expected, a misstep for a bumbag meant to differ from a purse's dimensions.

The authentic model boasts exceptionally soft, more lustrous leather, whereas the imitation exhibits an uncomfortably stiff faux leather texture.

Details on the counterfeit Louis Vuitton Bumbag fall short of the crispness expected, contrasting starkly with the bold, appealing features visible in the upper image.

While these authentication methods for the Louis Vuitton Bumbag remain highly pertinent in the face of current counterfeiting trends, it's alarming how swiftly fake producers are advancing.

We find, almost monthly, the growing challenge in discerning authentic pieces from replicas, as fakes are achieving alarming quality.

We recommend applying the techniques outlined in this guide, but for high-value purchases, seeking professional authentication may be a prudent step.

The Top Side Method

Let's examine the bumbag's top, focusing on where the handle connects to the leather.

On the genuine model, the handle extends longer compared to the replica, where its noticeably shorter length compromises the convenience of carrying the bag without slinging it.

The counterfeit handle sports a beige hue, deviating from the light brown showcased in the upper image.

The Font Method

The differences extend beyond just the shape and color of the handles, as noted earlier, to also include the font.

On the authentic handle, the letters are significantly smaller and etched more deeply into the leather, while in the bottom image, they appear larger and more superficially imprinted.

The Handle Attachments Method

While handle attachments might seem trivial, scrutinizing every aspect of the bag is crucial, as replica producers often fall short in their mimicry efforts.

The genuine handle sports a light brown tone, contrasting with the inauthentic one's light pink, a clear deviation from the original hue.

The stitching on the authentic version is uniform and secure, indicating the bumbag's durability, whereas the imitation fails to replicate this stitching quality.

We trust you're keeping pace with our guidelines! Distinguishing between fake and real Louis Vuitton should become straightforward after perusing this guide.

Should queries persist, feel free to engage us through live chat or proceed with obtaining your immediate authentication!

The Hardware Method

Hardware replication always poses a challenge, as Louis Vuitton typically employs high-grade metal, a quality clearly beyond the cost-cutting measures of replica manufacturers.

The hardware in the lower image is broader than expected and lacks the intended sharpness. Hardware must maintain the clarity and luster displayed in the upper picture.

Moreover, the inscriptions on the genuine hardware are slender and legible, unlike the indistinct, bolder letters on the faux metal, which are nearly indistinguishable.

The Puller Method

Echoing the previous method, the pullers on the replica bear little resemblance to the original, exhibiting a much yellower hue and diminished reflectiveness. The authentic puller is broader and also deviates in shape.

The Tag Method

The genuine tag boasts a more textured appearance, while the counterfeit one presents a smoother surface; the replica tag also exceeds the original in size and doesn't accurately mimic its shape.

Beyond the discrepancies in shape and size, the lettering on the authentic tag is bolder yet smaller, in contrast to the more slender and enlarged letters evident in the lower image.

The Label Method

This brings us to our final method for today. Whereas the original label forms a perfect rectangle, the replica label is inconsistently shaped, veering towards a square form.

Echoing previous methods, the font here is also compromised - the letters in the lower image are distorted, significantly larger, and bolder as well.

In Conclusion…