13 Methods
Dior date code checker, find the month and year
Enter the code from your Dior tag, including the letters.
What a Dior date code actually tells you
A Dior date code is a short string like 09-MA-0161, and the production date sits in the last four digits, read in an interleaved order rather than left to right. The first and third digits give the month, the second and fourth give the year. The two letters in the middle identify the workshop, not the date. The same check works on a bag, a wallet or a pair of shoes, the B30 sneaker included.
A Dior date code is a manufacturing reference, and the reading is a convention worked out by authenticators from dated pieces rather than anything Dior publishes. The professional course this page draws on says as much in as many words: the brand does not acknowledge the year reading. So treat a decoded date as what the numbers say, not as something the brand will confirm. Counterfeiters print plausible codes routinely. On Dior in particular the typeface and the depth of the stamping carry far more signal than the digits do, because current bags carry so little hardware that the logo and the code are two of the few checkable elements. Where a clean decode genuinely earns its keep is as a contradiction test: the same course fails a bag whose code reads July 2015 on a model that had not been released yet. A code that decodes cleanly tells you the numbers are internally consistent, nothing more.
Dior date codes era by era
| Era | What the marking looks like | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Style · factory · date code | Two digits, two letters, then four digits | 09-MA-0161 → June 2011, Italy |
| Date group only, four digits | The four-digit group on its own | 0161 → June 2011 |
| Older format, factory letters then the date group | Two letters then four digits, with no leading pair | RU0928 → February 1998, Italy |
Compiled from professional authentication references and reviewed in-house.
Dior date code chart by country
| Made in | Codes |
|---|---|
| Italy | BN BO MA RU |
| France | ID |
| Spain | MC |
Compiled from professional authentication references and reviewed in-house.
Where the date code sits on your Dior
Bags
Usually stamped on the reverse of the interior leather tag, so you have to lift or turn the tag to read it. Some pieces carry it on a tag of its own, and on others it is heat stamped straight into the leather or the lining rather than printed on a tag at all. Older bags put the two factory letters first with no leading pair of digits, in the same place.
Whatever is in front of the letters is a style or batch reference, not part of the date. The date is always the last four digits.
Wallets and small leather goods
Wallets, card holders and pouches use the same format and the same reading rule, and two independent authentication services give the same position for them: stamped discreetly on the trim of a card slot. Failing that, check the back of an interior leather tab and inside any pocket; on something this small the code is often heat stamped into the lining rather than printed on a tag at all. The handbook also notes that Spain, factory code MC, generally makes the small leather goods, so an MC code on a wallet is ordinary rather than odd.
The card-slot position is the best sourced placement on this page. A missing or irregular code on a small leather item is still much weaker evidence than the same thing on a bag.
Shoes and sneakers
Dior shoes carry the same four digit date group and it is read the same way. Nothing in our sources singles out the B30 sneaker, so treat a B30 as ordinary Dior footwear: if it carries a four digit group, this page reads it. The position is another matter. Our handbook sources photograph the code on bags and small leather goods, never on footwear, and the only authentication service we found that addresses shoes puts it no more precisely than inside the shoe, on the tongue or the insole or on the inside label. One source is not enough for us to point you at a spot, so look where the size and the made in text are printed, including underneath a removable sock liner, and treat a code you cannot find as no evidence either way.
The reading rule for footwear is sourced. The position on the shoe is not: it rests on a single reference. Do not read an absent code on a shoe as a verdict.
If your Dior has no code, or the code looks scrambled
Not every Dior item carries a readable date code, and some genuinely show irregular sequences. Dior only began stamping these codes around 1997, so a piece older than that will not have one at all, and its absence is not a fault. Small leather goods in particular are inconsistent. Check the reverse of the interior leather tag first, then any separate tag, then the leather itself; some codes are heat-stamped straight into the lining rather than onto a tag.
Dior date code questions
The things people actually ask us about Dior date codes, answered by the team that reads them for a living.
How do I read a Dior date code?
Take the four-digit group at the end. First and third digits give the month, second and fourth the year. So 0161 is June 2011. The two digits in front of the letters are not part of the date. It is counter-intuitive, which is why so many guides misread it.
What do the two letters in the middle mean?
They identify the factory. MA, BO and RU are Dior's three Italian plants and account for most bags, BN is a fourth and much rarer Italian one. ID is France and MC is Spain, and both are uncommon. Other two-letter groups do turn up, BM, CA and TR among them, and no reference we trust assigns them a country, so the checker returns the date and leaves the factory blank rather than guessing. On older pieces the letters come first, with no leading pair of digits, and the date is read the same way.
Where is the date code on a Dior bag?
Usually on the reverse of the interior leather tag. Some pieces carry it on a separate tag, and occasionally it is heat-stamped straight into the leather.
Can I tell an authentic Dior serial number from a fake one?
Not from the numbers alone. An authentic Dior serial number decodes to a sensible month and year, and so do plenty of codes on fakes, because a plausible code is easy to print. What separates them is the shape of the digits, the spacing and the depth of the stamp rather than the reading. A clean decode tells you the numbers are internally consistent, nothing more.
My code decodes to a month that doesn't exist. What now?
Usually a misread digit rather than a fake. 0 and 8, and 1 and 7, are easy to confuse in Dior's stamping. Photograph the tag in raking light and check again.
Does the code work the same way on the Dior B30 sneaker?
Yes, as far as anything documented goes. Dior footwear and small leather goods use the same format as the bags and the same reading rule, and nothing in our sources gives the B30 a system of its own, so if your pair carries a four digit group this page reads it. Two honest caveats. Our sources photograph the code on bags, not on shoes, so we cannot tell you a documented spot to look on a sneaker beyond where the size and the made in text are printed. And small items are the least consistent in the range, so a missing or odd code on a shoe is much weaker evidence than the same thing on a bag. Our own B30 counterfeit guide covers the rest of the sneaker, which is where the answer actually lies.
What if my Dior bag is older than 1997?
Then this page will not give you a year, on purpose. Every published reference puts the start of the system at about 1997 and every one of them hedges it; the earliest codes anyone publishes decode to February 1998 and May 1999, and the dated vintage listings we could check all decode to 2000 or later. Against that, the authenticator course reads a crocodile piece as September 1992 under the same rule, without a word about when the system began. Two sides, and we keep the floor at 1997 rather than print a year we cannot stand behind. An absent or undecodable code on a genuinely vintage Dior is not a fault either: several references note that early bags, the first Lady Diors included, are authentic with no code at all.
What should the digits look like, and why does the typeface matter so much on Dior?
On Italian-made pieces the strokes are deliberately uneven in weight: the 1 leans its head in close to the body, the 3 is small on top and larger below, the 5 has a flat C-shaped belly, the 6 and 9 sit at a slight slant, and the 8 is smaller on top than underneath. Size, height and spacing vary between characters, which is normal: each factory runs several sets of dies, and a French-made code uses a different face again. It matters more here than on other brands because most current Dior bags carry very little hardware, so the logo and the code are two of the few hard, checkable elements on the piece. Before 2019 the three Italian factories changed their die sets on a regular pattern, which is why a code can read correctly and still be wrong for its stated year.
My Dior bag says Made in France. Is that a problem?
Not on its own, and our sources disagree about it. The professional handbook photographs a MADE IN FRANCE Lady Dior tag stamped ID-0149 and ID-0211, the course shows the same two tags and reads them as April 2019 and January 2021, and one independent reference lists ID as the French factory code alongside MA, BO and RU for Italy and MC for Spain. Other widely read guides say the opposite, that Dior stopped making bags in France before the codes existed, so no French-made bag carries one. Treat a Made in France stamp on a coded bag as a reason to look harder rather than as a verdict in either direction. This is the one entry on this page our own sources contradict each other on, and we would rather say so than pick a side.
Get expert authentication
>99.89% accuracy · 2M+ verified





